Jim Haighs Letter to Judge Hardin
Judge Adlai S. Hardin, Jr.
United States Bankruptcy Court
300Quarropas Street
White Plains, New York 10601
Facsimile: (914) 761-0493
Your Honor,
I am writing this letter to provide insight from a trustee
of DP3 who voted AGAINST the stipulation that is currently under your
jurisdiction between Delta Airlines and DP3. I was selected as one of the original trustees of DP3 and
have attended every meeting of the Board over a three year period. I have spent countless hours answering
questions from our members and I care deeply about preserving the pensions
earned by all of our members. The
matter before you will cause tremendous permanent damage to ALL of the retired
pilots of Delta Airlines. The
stipulation is flawed in every respect and does not reflect the mission
statement of DP3 and is unworthy of the respect that the retired pilots have in
DP3. As a participant in the
ratification process, I am embarrassed how irresponsibly we have acted on
behalf of our constituency.
During the last week of May the trustees of DP3 were
informed that the Delta lawyers wanted to remove all objections to LOA 51 and
this would be a good time to discuss the non-qualified payments that had been
accruing since Delta filed for bankruptcy. This signaled the long awaited beginning of
negotiations. At a meeting in
Atlanta on Tuesday afternoon May 23rd we discussed some of the possible
negotiating options and departed for our homes that evening. At eight oclock the next morning I
received a call from the chairman of DP3 stating that we had a deal with
Delta and he needed my vote on the phone to ratify the agreement. When I asked what the deal was and when
would we be meeting to discuss its contents, he stated that he was calling
everyone personally to brief them and to get their vote. I indicated that I could not vote for
any agreement that I have not seen or had a chance to digest. Later that day, I was informed that we
would get the language of the stipulation the next afternoon and then we
would vote. I received the email
with the stipulation attached at 2:30 PM and at 3:00PM we had a conference call
to discuss and vote on the most important document that DP3 had in its three
years of existence.
It was during this conference call that we were told by our
attorney that the stipulation was NOT negotiable and we had to approve it as
written. We were also told by our
attorney that if we didnt sign the stipulation that Delta would not be able to
continue to operate because all the pilots who were eligible to retire would
take lump sums and leave Delta unable to staff the Airline. We were also told that we must vote
today because, if we didnt, Deltas lawyers would have to work over Memorial
Day weekend preparing briefs to oppose our opposition to LOA 51. It is clear to me now that an agreement
had been negotiated well before the meeting of the 23rd and the attorney for
DP3 was given a very lucrative incentive to sell the deal to the trustees. The compensation in the stipulation was
not discussed with the trustees and when questioned about it our attorney
indicated that he was surprised to see that piece in the agreement. It was not clear until days later that
the Balance Plan would also be a part of the attorneys compensation.
The very short time to contest the stipulation was
inappropriate. DP3 has not been
able to get a list of the retirees from Delta and our membership has grown only
by word of mouth. How is it
possible for the many retirees to disagree with the stipulation when we dont
have their contact information?
DP3s letter of explanation of the stipulation did not go out to our
members until the 7th of June and gave our constituents less than two weeks to
object to a very complex document.
Your Honor, it is my belief that the stipulation was created
by a flawed process that has not served our membership. The agreement was
reached by coercion and hollow threats and effectively muted the voice of the
retired pilots in fighting the termination of the Defined Benefit Plan. Most of
the retirees worked for over thirty years to EARN their pensions, and now they
have been singled out as the only employee group to lose their retirement
income. Many of the retired pilots
have already felt the sting of losing their non-qualified pensions, and now
they will receive a double hit by losing their qualified pensions.
If there can be anything fair about bankruptcy, please allow
the retired pilots a voice in the termination of their EARNED retirement
benefits. Whether it is DP3, DP2,
or some unnamed new group, they MUST be given an opportunity to be heard.
Sincerely Yours,
James D. Haigh