Delta Pilots Pension Appeal

Letter to PBGC
Home | Latest News | Our Purpose | Joining the Effort | Contact Us | Will Buergey Letter 11/12/2006 | Questions & Answers | Newsletter | Letter's to Congress | Lump Sum | Email #3 | Jim Haigh's Letter | Letter to PBGC

Letter to PBGC from Retired Captain Kerin L

 

Letter to PBGC from Retired Captain Kerin L. Shaughnessey

 

 

November14, 2006

 

 

PBGC

PO Box 151750

Alexandria, Virginia  22315-1750

 

PBGC Board Members,

 

I am a military vet and served six years in the 186th Army Aviation Guards in Burlington, Vermont.   In 1966 I was hired as a commercial pilot, and flew for 36 years. I retired with Delta Air Lines on December 1, 2002 as a captain on the B-777.  I flew as a captain for 23 of those 36 years with the company.  According to the contract I retired under signed in June 2001, I more than qualified for a retirement pension.  I met the criteria of 25 years of service by more than 11 years.  I was over the age criteria of 50 by almost 9 years.  I retired exactly 13 months prior to the government mandatory retirement of age 60.  Under the contract with Delta leaving 13 months early cost me a 3% reduction in my pension retirement.

 

Now that the courts have given the okay for Delta to drop the retired pilots pension plan I have lost approximately 85% of my earned pension.  Over 1300 of the retired pilots age 65 and over have had very little change to their pension check.    Many of these pilots have just over 25 years of service and never flew the larger equipment which under the PWA/ contract determines a more substantial annuity in retirement.  Nevertheless, these retirees are continuing to receive their pensions pretty much intact while I, and many other like myself, have been unfairly penalized due to our younger age.  This is clearly a case of age discrimination.

 

My father who retired from Delta, as a captain on the L-1011, in November 1979 and died in July 1988 received approximately $4,000.00 less a year in his pension annuity when he retired than I was receiving in my retirement annuity.   According to Deltas interpretation of the PBGC rules his widow receives one half his annuities which are approximately 5.2 times what I am now currently receiving in retirement.  This further illustrates the case of age discrimination.  (I want to state very clearly I am not stating in any manner these retired pilots and widows do not deserve their full pensions.  Their pensions were earned, and therefore deserved.)   This case is just another example to demonstrate how unfairly age plays into the interpretation of Deltas calculations when it comes to figuring the PBGC guidelines.  Delta did not take into account our contracted criteria when figuring the value of the individual pension annuities when they sent the October 2006 checks.  

 

Deltas termination of the Retired Pilots Pension Plan does not meet the ERISAs distress test or the debtors burden of proof for their dumping the Retired Pilots Pension Plan on the PBGC and the US taxpayers.  Delta chose to pay the active ALPA pilots $650 million dollars for their pension plan plus a promise for active pilots only in a claim in bankruptcy of $2.1 billion.  This is a clear violation of the ERISA guidelines which states in bankruptcy retired employees are taken care of first, prior to active employees.  There obviously was some sort of bribe associated with the active pilots which is a violation of the law.

 

ALPA negotiated the language and conditions for the pilots and the retired pilots in their PWA (Pilots Working Agreement) contract of June 2001.  This contract of 2001 was the bible that set the standards/conditions of my retirement with the company in 2002.   However, ALPA refused to defend the contract as it related to the retired pilots in the bankruptcy proceedings, and then they turned around and made a deal with Delta not to fight the termination of the Retired Pilots Pension Plan. Instead ALPA chose to make a lucrative deal with Delta for the active pilots to the tune of $2.75 billion.  Unfortunately for the retired pilots, ALPA has a history of not always bargaining appropriately for its membership.

 

Delta stated in the bankruptcy court the average retired pilots would be receiving approximately $75,000 per year after termination of the plan. This was printed in several papers across the US.  Why did the attorneys for Delta state this in court---------for whose benefit was this false statement made??  

 

Delta chose to terminate the unsecured portion of the pilots pension plan prior to the PBGC taking over the pension plan.  This was the first time any airline had ever terminate the unsecured portion of the pension plan prior to the PBGCs acceptance of the plan.  This action violated labor laws.  However, Delta cherry picked a portion of the contract to terminate while the contract was still in effect.  Procedurally Delta should have waited until the whole contract was terminated, but instead chose to do things their way.

 

DP3 was established to preserve the pensions and benefits of the retired pilots.  The leaders of the group are mainly ex-Delta management personnel.  The group is composed mostly of pilots on disability, and, or over age 65.  This group never once opposed Delta in the termination of the pilots pension plan.  Everything they did was done on their own.  They never asked nor sought any direction from their membership group.  They appeared to be predisposed in the direction they were taking, and the direction they took was not beneficial to the retired pilots.

 

Right now Delta is expanding.  They have recalled 1,000 furloughed flight attendants and roughly 130 pilots so far this year.  Delta is growing their international operations, and Delta just posted earning $52 million in the third quarter of 2006.  In the new Pension Protection Act that was recently passed by Congress Delta received a 17 year amortization schedules for unfunded liabilities.  Delta is eligible for the 17 years amortization schedule, but they have chosen not to utilize it.  They have chosen instead to terminate the Retired Pilots Pension Plan and dump it on the PBGC.

 

Deltas major claim in bankruptcy court was they needed to terminate the retired pilots pension plan because of the lump sum provision.  Delta claimed, if they did not terminate the plan, a large number of retiring pilots would prevent them from emerging from bankruptcy because of the flow of money in the lump sums provision to the eligible pilots.  This is a false claim because nowhere in court was it proven 800-1000 eligible pilots would retire if given the chance to utilize the lump sum provision.  No study or thorough research was ever carried out.  Again they made inflated statements to make Delta look better in the eyes of the court.

 

Why did Delta single out only the Retired Pilots Pension Plan in the bankruptcy proceedings?    I suspect Delta felt the retired pilots are an easy prey.  They know we can not recoup our losses because age and our profession prevent us from continuing work in our chosen field.  As a group, we are a scattered all over the US, and we now no longer have the financial means to fight corporate giants, like Delta. We have no representation in our fight because ALPA has rejected the retired pilots every step of the way, and DP3 never kept their promise to fight and preserve our benefits and retirement plan.   They preserved nothing!   The retired pilots were an easy mark, and if their pension plan is terminated, Delta gets a free loan from the US taxpayers amounting to $2.4 billion.  Not bad, but it was done on the backs of the retired pilots.

 

Please remember in your deliberations of facts pension benefits are contracted for in lieu of salary. They are not giveaway programs.  Also, every time a company walks away from a pension plan there is less retirement security for everyone.  Stripping this security away is a real threat to America and its economic future. Please right this wrong and hold Delta accountable to its retired pilots who have earned the right to keep their pension annuities.  Congress has shown faith in Delta by allowing them an extended 17 year period of time to fund their under funded pension plans.  Delta is rejecting this extension of time in favor of plan termination.   However unlike Delta, Northwest Airlines, the only other airline to receive the 17 year extension for under funded plans, is honoring its contract with all its employees.  Please look at the facts and do not give Delta the right to terminate the Retired Pilots Pension Plan.  

 

I respectfully thank you for your time.

 

Respectfully yours,

 

 

Retired Captain Kerin L. Shaughnessey

 

Pension Appeal - Please Join- Pension Appeal - Please Join - Pension Appeal-Please Join-